Use regular HashSet instead of LinkedHashSet for unordered replies
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1182,7 +1182,7 @@ public class Jedis extends BinaryJedis implements JedisCommands {
|
||||
runChecks();
|
||||
client.smembers(key);
|
||||
final List<String> members = client.getMultiBulkReply();
|
||||
return new LinkedHashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
return new HashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -1306,7 +1306,7 @@ public class Jedis extends BinaryJedis implements JedisCommands {
|
||||
runChecks();
|
||||
client.sinter(keys);
|
||||
final List<String> members = client.getMultiBulkReply();
|
||||
return new LinkedHashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
return new HashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@ public class Jedis extends BinaryJedis implements JedisCommands {
|
||||
runChecks();
|
||||
client.sunion(keys);
|
||||
final List<String> members = client.getMultiBulkReply();
|
||||
return new LinkedHashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
return new HashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -1394,7 +1394,7 @@ public class Jedis extends BinaryJedis implements JedisCommands {
|
||||
runChecks();
|
||||
client.sdiff(keys);
|
||||
final List<String> members = client.getMultiBulkReply();
|
||||
return new LinkedHashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
return new HashSet<String>(members);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user