New generator options for oneofs: allow skipping or generating as normal 'optional' fields.
The behaviour with no_unions:true is the same as of nanopb 0.3.1 and earlier.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,6 +11,25 @@ are included, in order to make it easier to find this document.
|
||||
|
||||
.. contents ::
|
||||
|
||||
Nanopb-0.3.2 (2015-01-xx)
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
Add support for OneOfs
|
||||
----------------------
|
||||
**Rationale:** Previously nanopb did not support the *oneof* construct in
|
||||
*.proto* files. Those fields were generated as regular *optional* fields.
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes:** OneOfs are now generated as C unions. Callback fields are not
|
||||
supported inside oneof and generator gives an error.
|
||||
|
||||
**Required actions:** The generator option *no_unions* can be used to restore old
|
||||
behaviour and to allow callbacks to be used. To use unions, one change is
|
||||
needed: use *which_xxxx* field to detect which field is present, instead
|
||||
of *has_xxxx*. Compare the value against *MyStruct_myfield_tag*.
|
||||
|
||||
**Error indications:** Generator error: "Callback fields inside of oneof are
|
||||
not supported". Compiler error: "Message" has no member named "has_xxxx".
|
||||
|
||||
Nanopb-0.3.0 (2014-08-26)
|
||||
=========================
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -591,7 +591,7 @@ class OneOf(Field):
|
||||
def add_field(self, field):
|
||||
if field.allocation == 'CALLBACK':
|
||||
raise Exception("Callback fields inside of oneof are not supported"
|
||||
+ " (field %s)" % field.fullname)
|
||||
+ " (field %s)" % field.name)
|
||||
|
||||
field.union_name = self.name
|
||||
field.rules = 'ONEOF'
|
||||
@@ -652,13 +652,20 @@ class Message:
|
||||
def __init__(self, names, desc, message_options):
|
||||
self.name = names
|
||||
self.fields = []
|
||||
self.oneofs = []
|
||||
self.oneofs = {}
|
||||
no_unions = []
|
||||
|
||||
if hasattr(desc, 'oneof_decl'):
|
||||
for f in desc.oneof_decl:
|
||||
oneof = OneOf(self.name, f)
|
||||
self.oneofs.append(oneof)
|
||||
self.fields.append(oneof)
|
||||
for i, f in enumerate(desc.oneof_decl):
|
||||
oneof_options = get_nanopb_suboptions(desc, message_options, self.name + f.name)
|
||||
if oneof_options.no_unions:
|
||||
no_unions.append(i) # No union, but add fields normally
|
||||
elif oneof_options.type == nanopb_pb2.FT_IGNORE:
|
||||
pass # No union and skip fields also
|
||||
else:
|
||||
oneof = OneOf(self.name, f)
|
||||
self.oneofs[i] = oneof
|
||||
self.fields.append(oneof)
|
||||
|
||||
for f in desc.field:
|
||||
field_options = get_nanopb_suboptions(f, message_options, self.name + f.name)
|
||||
@@ -666,8 +673,11 @@ class Message:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
field = Field(self.name, f, field_options)
|
||||
if hasattr(f, 'oneof_index') and f.HasField('oneof_index'):
|
||||
self.oneofs[f.oneof_index].add_field(field)
|
||||
if (hasattr(f, 'oneof_index') and
|
||||
f.HasField('oneof_index') and
|
||||
f.oneof_index not in no_unions):
|
||||
if f.oneof_index in self.oneofs:
|
||||
self.oneofs[f.oneof_index].add_field(field)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.fields.append(field)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -734,7 +744,7 @@ class Message:
|
||||
'''Returns number of required fields inside this message'''
|
||||
count = 0
|
||||
for f in self.fields:
|
||||
if f not in self.oneofs:
|
||||
if not isinstance(f, OneOf):
|
||||
if f.rules == 'REQUIRED':
|
||||
count += 1
|
||||
return count
|
||||
@@ -742,7 +752,7 @@ class Message:
|
||||
def count_all_fields(self):
|
||||
count = 0
|
||||
for f in self.fields:
|
||||
if f in self.oneofs:
|
||||
if isinstance(f, OneOf):
|
||||
count += len(f.fields)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
count += 1
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -53,6 +53,9 @@ message NanoPBOptions {
|
||||
|
||||
// Skip this message
|
||||
optional bool skip_message = 6 [default = false];
|
||||
|
||||
// Generate oneof fields as normal optional fields instead of union.
|
||||
optional bool no_unions = 8 [default = false];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Extensions to protoc 'Descriptor' type in order to define options
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user